Yahoo webcam

posted by | Leave a comment

“We were not aware of, nor would we condone, this reported activity,” a Yahoo spokesperson told the Guardian.“This report, if true, represents a whole new level of violation of our users’ privacy that is completely unacceptable, and we strongly call on the world’s governments to reform surveillance law consistent with the principles we outlined in December.Also, the fact that the Yahoo software allows more than one person to view a webcam stream without necessarily sending a reciprocal stream means that it appears sometimes to be used for broadcasting pornography," the report cited the leaked classified documents.With no discussion or details about possible age, gender, or nationality of the monitored Yahoo webcam chats, it is only clear that the snooping done by GCHQ is the worst possible nightmare of those who engaged in sexually, provocative chats."We were not aware of, nor would we condone, this reported activity.As one document describes it, “think Tom Cruise in .” “Face detection has the potential to aid selection of useful images for ‘mugshots’ or even for face recognition by assessing the angle of the face,” reads the document.“The best images are ones where the person is facing the camera with their face upright.” Problem is, GCHQ found that many Yahoo chat users positioned themselves a bit, well, differently.This time, details about alleged nude images collected by the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) of Britain have surfaced and have created another tidal wave of privacy concerns.

Yahoo webcam-50Yahoo webcam-63Yahoo webcam-6

As one document notes, “there is no perfect ability to censor material which may be offensive.

This resulted in between 3 percent and 11 percent of the images collected containing “undesirable nudity,” as one document put it. it would appear that a surprising number of people use webcam conversations to show intimate parts of their body to the other person,” reads one document.

“Also, the fact that the Yahoo software allows more than one person to view a webcam stream without necessarily sending a reciprocal stream means that it appears sometimes to be used for broadcasting pornography.” While Minority Report-esque bulk facial recognition software aimed at innocent people’s bedrooms is a staggering violation of privacy, GCHQ appears to have made substantial efforts to keep images of naked Yahoo video chat users from being seen by analysts. In some instances, Optic Nerve incorrectly identified faces as nudity.

This report, if true, represents a whole new level of violation of our users' privacy that is completely unacceptable, and we strongly call on the world's governments to reform surveillance law consistent with the principles we outlined in December.

We are committed to preserving our users' trust and security and continue our efforts to expand encryption across all of our services," a Yahoo spokesperson said.

Leave a Reply

dating single mom teenage daughter